Friendshoring and Mineral Partnerships
Friendshoring - the deliberate strategy of shifting supply chains toward allied and trusted partner nations - has emerged as a central pillar of Western critical minerals policy. Recognizing that China's dominance over mineral processing cannot be broken through domestic production alone, the United States, the European Union, Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, and the United Kingdom are building a network of bilateral and multilateral partnerships designed to create diversified, resilient supply chains among geopolitically aligned countries. These partnerships span the full value chain, from mining investment and processing capacity to research collaboration and strategic stockpiling.
14
MSP member countries & the EU
2024
EU CRMA entered into force
10+
EU Strategic Partnerships
$3.8bn
Canada Critical Minerals budget
The Three Major Frameworks
Select a framework to compare its design, members, and real-world effectiveness.
The IRA's Mineral Sourcing Requirements
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 conditions electric vehicle tax credits on where battery minerals come from. This created a powerful incentive for nations to negotiate Critical Minerals Agreements (CMAs) with Washington - minerals from CMA partner countries count toward IRA thresholds, making CMAs economically valuable, not just symbolic.
IRA Phase-in Schedule: Minimum % of value from USA or FTA/CMA partners
To qualify for the full $7,500 EV battery tax credit
The first CMA was signed with Japan in March 2023, followed by agreements with the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Australia. These agreements cover trade facilitation for critical minerals, cooperation on supply chain transparency, joint research and development, and mutual recognition of environmental and labor standards. The phase-in schedule requires an increasing percentage of battery mineral value to come from the United States or FTA/CMA partners, reaching 80% for critical minerals by 2027 - a timeline that many industry observers consider extremely ambitious given the lengthy permitting and construction cycles for mineral projects.
Key Partner Countries
The countries at the centre of Western friendshoring strategies, the minerals they supply, and their partnership depth.
Largest lithium producer globally. JOGMEC and KOMIR have active offtake agreements. Critical to Quad minerals strategy.
Key minerals
Partner nations
USA · Japan · South Korea · EU · UK · India
USMCA qualifies minerals for IRA. CAD $3.8bn Critical Minerals Strategy. Joint Action Plan with USA on supply chain mapping.
Key minerals
Partner nations
USA · EU · Japan · UK
First CMA partner with USA (March 2023). JOGMEC active globally. Lynas rare earth supply deal critical post-China export controls.
Key minerals
Partner nations
USA · Australia · Canada · Philippines · Zambia
EU Strategic Partnership signed. World's largest lithium reserves. National Lithium Strategy introduces state-majority requirements for new projects.
Key minerals
Partner nations
EU · USA · South Korea · Japan
MSP-identified hub for cobalt and copper supply. Growing as alternative to DRC. EU Strategic Partnership signed 2023.
Key minerals
Partner nations
EU · USA (MSP) · UK
EU Strategic Partnership. Germany's key partner for green hydrogen. Growing lithium sector with beneficiation requirements.
Key minerals
Partner nations
EU · UK · Germany
70%+ of global cobalt. EU Strategic Partnership active but governance concerns persist. Heavy Chinese investment complicates Western access.
Key minerals
Partner nations
EU · USA (MSP) · UK
World's largest uranium producer. EU Strategic Partnership signed 2023. Balancing relationships with Russia and the West.
Key minerals
Partner nations
EU · USA · UK
Australia–Japan–South Korea: A Model for Deep Cooperation
Australia, as the world's largest producer of lithium and a major source of rare earths, nickel, cobalt, and other critical minerals, occupies a central position in friendshoring strategies. Japan and South Korea, both heavily dependent on imported minerals for their advanced manufacturing sectors, have pursued deep bilateral cooperation with Australia. Japan's Organisation for Metals and Energy Security (JOGMEC) has invested in Australian mining projects and signed long-term offtake agreements for rare earth concentrates from Lynas and lithium from various Western Australian producers.
South Korea's state-backed Korea Mine Rehabilitation and Mineral Resources Corporation (KOMIR) and private companies such as POSCO have invested in Australian lithium and nickel projects. POSCO's lithium hydroxide plant in Gwangyang, South Korea, sources spodumene concentrate from Australian mines, creating a vertically integrated supply chain that bypasses Chinese processing. These bilateral relationships are reinforced by broader diplomatic frameworks, including the Quad (comprising the United States, Japan, Australia, and India) and AUKUS, which increasingly incorporate supply chain security as a component of strategic cooperation.
Canada's Critical Minerals Strategy
Canada has positioned itself as a preferred partner for critical mineral friendshoring, leveraging its abundant mineral resources, stable governance, and close trade relationships with the United States, Europe, and Japan. The Canadian Critical Minerals Strategy, published in December 2022, allocated CAD 3.8 billion in funding to support mining, processing, and recycling projects. Canada's mineral endowment includes significant deposits of lithium, cobalt, nickel, rare earths, graphite, and uranium, making it one of the few countries with the geological potential to contribute across multiple critical mineral supply chains.
Canadian partnerships with the United States are particularly deep, facilitated by the USMCA trade agreement (which qualifies Canadian minerals for IRA benefits), joint regulatory harmonization efforts, and cross-border infrastructure connections. The Joint Action Plan on Critical Minerals Collaboration between the two countries covers supply chain mapping, investment coordination, and joint research on mineral processing technologies.
Challenges and Limitations
Friendshoring faces structural obstacles that diplomatic agreements alone cannot resolve. Click each challenge to read more.
The core tension
The optimal outcome for global supply security would involve diversified, transparent, and interconnected supply chains rather than parallel, isolated ones. But achieving this in an era of intensifying great power competition remains a formidable challenge. Friendshoring is a necessary second-best - better than dependence on a single dominant supplier, but not a substitute for a well-functioning, rules-based global mineral trade.
Related Topics
Why China Dominates Processing
The industrial dominance that friendshoring strategies aim to counterbalance.
Resource Nationalism
How resource-rich partner nations balance friendshoring commitments with domestic value capture.
Critical Minerals and National Security
The national security imperatives driving allied mineral supply chain cooperation.
Export Controls and Restrictions
The trade restrictions that make diversified sourcing through partnerships essential.